Skip to Main Content
UCF Libraries Home

ESI 6891 - IEMS Research Methods

Examples of Systematic Literature Reviews

Harie, Y., Gautam, B. P., & Wasaki, K. (2023). Computer Vision Techniques for Growth Prediction: A Prisma-Based Systematic Literature Review. Applied Sciences, 5335 (25 pp.). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095335

Wolf, A., Miehling, J., & Wartzack, S. (2020). "Challenges in interaction modelling with digital human models – A systematic literature review of interaction modelling approaches." Ergonomics, 63(11), 1442-1458. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2020.1786606

R. Sharma, S. S. Kamble, A. Gunasekaran, V. Kumar, and A. Kumar, “A systematic literature review on machine learning applications for       sustainable agriculture supply chain performance,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 119, p. 104926, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2020.104926.

A. Tandon, A. Dhir, A. K. M. N. Islam, and M. Mäntymäki, “Blockchain in healthcare: A systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda,” Computers in Industry, vol. 122, p. 103290, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2020.103290.

K. S. Muhs, W. Karwowski, and D. Kern, “Temporal variability in human performance: A systematic literature review,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 64, pp. 31–50, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2017.10.002.

M. Sony, J. Antony, S. Park, and M. Mutingi, “Key criticisms of six sigma: a systematic literature review,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 950–962, Aug. 2020, DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2018.2889517

 

 

Systematic Literature Review Outline Topic - AI in Academic Libraries

1. Title Page

  • Title: "The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Libraries: A Systematic Review"
  • Author: Ven Basco
  • Affiliation: John C. Hitt Libraries
  • Date

2. Abstract

  • Brief summary of the background, objectives, methods, key findings, and conclusions.

3. Introduction

  • Background: Why is AI relevant to academic libraries?
  • Problem Statement: What gap in knowledge does this review address?
  • Objectives: What are you trying to find out?
  • Research Questions: e.g.,
    • How is AI being implemented in academic libraries?
    • What are the benefits and challenges?
    • What trends or gaps exist in the literature?

4. Methods (PRISMA Framework)

A. Eligibility Criteria

  • Inclusion: Peer-reviewed articles, published between 2020–2025, English language, focused on AI in academic libraries.
  • Exclusion: Non-academic sources, articles not focused on libraries or AI. Thesis and dissertations. Monographs. Grey literature. (THIS APPLIES FOR THIS CLASS ONLY)

B. Information Sources

  • Databases: Engineering Collection, Web of Science, Library & Information Science Source, IEEE Xplore, Ergonomics Abstracts, Applied Science & Technology Source, ABI/Inform, APA PsycInfo, etc. https://guides.ucf.edu/c.php?g=78335&p=509359

C. Search Strategy

  • Keywords: “Artificial Intelligence,” “Academic Libraries,” “Machine Learning,” “Library Automation,” etc.
  • Boolean example:
    ("artificial intelligence" OR "machine learning") AND ("academic libraries" OR "university libraries")

D. Selection Process

  • Use PRISMA flow diagram to show:
    • Records identified
    • Records screened
    • Full-text articles assessed
    • Studies included

E. Data Extraction

  • Create a table with:
    • Author(s)
    • Year
    • Country
    • AI Technology Used
    • Application Area (e.g., reference services, cataloging)
    • Key Findings

F. Quality Assessment

  • Use a checklist (e.g., CASP or JBI) to assess study quality.

5. Results

  • Descriptive Summary: Number of studies, publication years, countries, etc.
  • Thematic Analysis: Group findings into themes such as:
    • AI for user services
    • AI in collection management
    • Ethical concerns
    • Staff training and resistance

6. Discussion

  • Interpret findings in relation to your research questions.
  • Compare with previous reviews or frameworks.
  • Discuss implications for practice and policy in academic libraries.

7. Limitations

  • Limitations of your review (e.g., language bias, database coverage).

8. Conclusion

  • Summarize key insights.
  • Suggest areas for future research.

9. References

  • Use APA, MLA, or your required citation style.

10. Appendices

  • PRISMA Flow Diagram
  • Search strings
  • Data extraction table