Welcome
This Funder Tool Kit specifically highlights the National Science Foundation (NSF). It includes news, priorities, funding opportunities, and award history, as well as proposal guidance and resources. The Funder Tool Kits are a collaborative effort between the UCF Libraries and OR Research Development Team.
LIBRARY RESOURCES
Books/eBooks
Get Funded by
An essential guide for those who wish to hone their skills in writing successful grant applications. Scientific research relies on funding, and everyone who conducts research must become adept at funding their research. This book explains how to attain the number one source of research funding: grants. Readers will learn how to prepare grant proposals, how and when to interact with funding institutions, how to interpret and respond to peer review feedback, and much more. Most importantly, they will learn how to identify and convey what makes their proposed research impactful, innovative, and achievable. Author Jeffrey Wayne Elias has an extensive career in grant funding, including 27 years in academia working on grant support and grant reviewing, plus 19 years in grant management and administration. This experience affords him a well-rounded perspective on why some applications succeed while others don't. Elias helps readers develop and strengthen their ability to navigate the grant application process--ultimately enabling them to achieve "grant literacy."
ISBN: 9781433836442Publication Date: 2023-11-21
Winning Large NSF Proposals by
Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
Publication Date: 2016
Having Success with NSF: A Practical Guide by
This book is designed to help researchers achieve success in funding their National Science Foundation (NSF) research proposals. The book discusses aspects of the proposal submission and review process that are not typically communicated to the research community. Written by authors with successful track records in grant writing and years of experience as NSF Program Directors, this book provides an insider's view of successful grantsmanship. Written in a practical approach, this book offers tips that will not be found in official paperwork and provides answers to questions frequently asked of NSF Program Directors. The purpose of the book is to improve your NSF grant-writing skills and improve your chances of funding.
Publication Date: 2013
Write Like a Chemist: a guide & resource, 2nd edition
Write Like a Chemist (2nd ed.) is a one-of-a-kind volume, written to serve as a textbook and resource for chemistry students, post-docs, faculty, and other chemistry professionals. The book focuses on four types of chemistry writing: the journal article, conference abstract, scientific poster, and research proposal. The book includes numerous excerpts from American Chemical Society (ACS) journal articles, ACS conference abstracts, and successful NSF proposals, all serving as excellent models of scientific writing. A model poster is also included. Write Like a Chemist’s read–analyze–write approach underscores the importance of reading authentic texts, analyzing them, and using them as models for disciplinary writing. Analyses focus on conciseness, level of detail, and formality; organization; writing conventions; grammar and punctuation; and content expressed in prose and graphics. Exercises are included in each chapter. Together, these features turn the complex process of writing into graduated, achievable tasks. Additional features of the book include the formatting of figures, tables, citations, and references. ACS chemistry writing conventions, as advocated in the ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication (Banik et al., 2020), are modelled throughout.
Call Number: UCF ONLINE General Collection -- QD9.15 .W75 2022
Successful Grant Proposals in Science, Technology, and Medicine by
There are many resources on grant writing in science, technology and medicine, but most do not provide the practical advice needed to write the narratives of grant proposals. Designed to help novice and experienced investigators write compelling narratives and acquire research funding, this is a detailed guide to the content, organisation, layout, phrasing, and scientific argumentation of narratives. The authors draw on more than twenty years of research and analysis of grant proposals, having worked extensively with investigators at different levels, from pre-doctoral students to senior scientists. They have used this experience to design a framework for scientific writing that you can apply directly to narratives. The guidelines and advice offered are applicable across many funding agencies, including the NIH and NSF. Featuring many real-life examples, the book covers a range of topics, from organisational alternatives to best practices in grammar and editing, overview visuals, and working with contributors.
Publication Date: 2015Undergraduate Research Experiences for STEM Students by Undergraduate research has a rich history, and many practicing researchers point to undergraduate research experiences (UREs) as crucial to their own career success. There are many ongoing efforts to improve undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education that focus on increasing the active engagement of students and decreasing traditional lecture-based teaching, and UREs have been proposed as a solution to these efforts and may be a key strategy for broadening participation in STEM. In light of the proposals questions have been asked about what is known about student participation in UREs, best practices in UREs design, and evidence of beneficial outcomes from UREs. Undergraduate Research Experiences for STEM Students provides a comprehensive overview of and insights about the current and rapidly evolving types of UREs, in an effort to improve understanding of the complexity of UREs in terms of their content, their surrounding context, the diversity of the student participants, and the opportunities for learning provided by a research experience. This study analyzes UREs by considering them as part of a learning system that is shaped by forces related to national policy, institutional leadership, and departmental culture, as well as by the interactions among faculty, other mentors, and students. The report provides a set of questions to be considered by those implementing UREs as well as an agenda for future research that can help answer questions about how UREs work and which aspects of the experiences are most powerful.
Publication Date: 2017
Books
New Research Opportunities in the Earth Sciences by
The 2001 National Research Council (NRC) report Basic Research Opportunities in Earth Science (BROES) described how basic research in the Earth sciences serves five national imperatives: (1) discovery, use, and conservation of natural resources; (2) characterization and mitigation of natural hazards; (3) geotechnical support of commercial and infrastructure development; (4) stewardship of the environment; and (5) terrestrial surveillance for global security and national defense. This perspective is even more pressing today, and will persist into the future, with ever-growing emphasis. Today's world-with headlines dominated by issues involving fossil fuel and water resources, earthquake and tsunami disasters claiming hundreds of thousands of lives and causing hundreds of billions of dollars in damages, profound environmental changes associated with the evolving climate system, and nuclear weapons proliferation and testing-has many urgent societal issues that need to be informed by sound understanding of the Earth sciences. A national strategy to sustain basic research and training of expertise across the full spectrum of the Earth sciences is motivated by these national imperatives. New Research Opportunities in the Earth Sciences identifies new and emerging research opportunities in the Earth sciences over the next decade, including surface and deep Earth processes and interdisciplinary research with fields such as ocean and atmospheric sciences, biology, engineering, computer science, and social and behavioral sciences. The report also identifies key instrumentation and facilities needed to support these new and emerging research opportunities. The report describes opportunities for increased cooperation in these new and emerging areas between EAR and other government agency programs, industry, and international programs, and suggests new ways that EAR can help train the next generation of Earth scientists, support young investigators, and increase the participation of underrepresented groups in the field.
Publication Date: 2012
Writing Successful Grant Proposals from the Top down and Bottom Up by
This text provides comprehensive advice on how to build a successful grant proposal, from the top down and from the bottom up. Editor Robert J. Sternberg gathers editorial expertise from distinguished members of associations in the Federation of Associations of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, which includes some of the most successful grant applicants and grant givers in the field of brain and behavioral sciences. The chapter authors offer readers practical advice on planning, executing, submitting, and revising grant proposals in order to maximize their chances of success. Exploring both grant writers' and grant providers' perspectives, Writing Successful Grant Proposals from the Top Down and Bottom Up provides valuable insight into general strategies on how to write and submit proposals, as well as detailed information on the various types of proposals needed to reach particular research and teaching goals.
Publication Date: 2013
Use Primo Search to Find More!
Primo is an easy way to search almost all the content UCF can access, including the catalog, books, e-books, videos, articles, STARS Collections, and more.
SEARCH |
PROPOSAL PREPARATION
FIND INFORMATION: News, Funding Opportunities, and Past Awards
NSF 101 - Answers commonly asked questions for applicants who might be new to applying for NSF funding opportunities and want to know more about how to communicate with NSF. NSF101 collaborates with program staff across the agency to provide clear, basic instructions to improve accessibility and demystify the NSF experience.
Understanding NSF Research Areas
NSF Strategic Plan (2022-2026)
10 Big Ideas for Future NSF Investments - These are meant to define a set of cutting-edge research agendas and processes that are uniquely suited for NSF’s broad portfolio of investments, and will require collaborations with industry, private foundations, other agencies, science academies and societies, and universities.
NSF's Toolkit - information about the impact of NSF's investments in science and engineering research and education
NSF Grants Conferences - past and upcoming conference information
NSF Public Access Repository - the repository has peer-reviewed papers and other products of NSF-funded research
UCF Workshops on NSF-related topics
Pivot database (NSF saved search - UCF Single Sign On Required) - adapt this search to receive alerts on NSF funding related to your research area
NSF Collaborations With Federal Agencies and Others
Crosscutting and NSF-wide programs
Grants.gov (NSF search) - Browse current/forecasted NSF funding opportunities
NSF Supplemental Funding - for New/Renewal Proposals and Active awards
Upcoming Deadlines (RSS Feed):
Award Search - Active UCF Awards, All UCF Awards, or Create New Search
- For CAREER and EAGER award information, please see those tabs below.
NSF Budget Info System - Statistical and Funding History Reports and NSF Funding to UCF.
FOIA Request Information (NSF)
The OR Research Development team maintains a library of internal/external submitted proposals and can assist with securing a sample and submitting FOIA requests. Contact Research Development for more information.
PLAN YOUR PROPOSAL: Guidance and Resources
NSF Review information:
- NSF Timeline for Agency Review
- Merit Review Facts - Important facts about the NSF merit review process
- Merit Review Orientation Resources - From NSF Office of Integrative Activities
- NSF Reviewer Guidance Video: "The Art and Science of Reviewing Proposals"
Additional topics for NSF proposals:
- NSF Toolkit (Hanover Research) - information and resources to assist faculty in understanding NSF funding and navigating the process of applying and submitting a proposal
- Interdisciplinary Research - Guide for investigators submitting an unsolicited interdisciplinary proposal for which there may not be a natural "home" in one of the existing NSF programs
- Transformative Research - Brief introduction to potentially transformative research and its support at NSF
- NSF - Education Research and Development
- NSF Handbook for Project Evaluation - Resource for project directors and principal investigators who will be evaluating NSF’s educational projects
- NSF Advice to Proposal Writers
- Project Management for Research (from OSU)
Faculty Early Career Development Program (CAREER)
-
CAREER Information
-
CAREER Resources
-
CAREER Mentoring program at UCF
-
Departmental Letter template - (UCF SSO login required)
-
Samples - Contact Research Development for next steps!
-
-
CAREER Presentations
-
The Research Development team in the UCF Office of Research coordinates a series of workshops specifically on aspects of NSF CAREER. Past awardees and specialist speakers provide insights on planning, development, and review of CAREER proposals. For more information, visit the RD Outreach and Events.
-
Rapid Response Research (RAPID)
In addition to standard research proposals, NSF also has the Rapid Response Research (RAPID) proposal type. This type of proposal is used when there is a severe urgency with regard to availability of, or access to, data, facilities or specialized equipment, including quick-response research on natural or anthropogenic disasters and similar unanticipated events. See NSF PAPPG for additional information on RAPID proposals.
-
RAPID proposals are NOT for: (1) Projects appropriate for submission as regular NSF proposals. (2) Events that are unanticipated due to lack of awareness of timelines; or (3) Collection of only non-perishable data.
-
Prior communication with NSF Program Manager is required with email documentation confirming approval to submit a RAPID proposal - THIS IS THE FIRST STEP.
-
Submit a 1-2 page pre-proposal (and/or any questions) to a PM managing the program where the research is aligned. All questions about COVID19-related research should be addressed directly to a cognizant NSF Program Officer for the NSF program with which the research would be most closely aligned.
-
RAPID proposals may be submitted to existing NSF funding opportunities
-
-
Once invited to submit a full RAPID proposal:
-
Title of the proposal must begin with the prefix "RAPID:"
-
$200K max amount for up to one year
-
Project Description is limited to 5 pages
-
NSF RAPID grants must follow standard proposal preparation instructions in the NSF PAPPG except for the RAPID-specific requirements, unless explicitly noted in a specific RFP or directed by an NSF program manager.
-
-
-
View RAPID Awards - NSF Advanced Award Search
EArly-concept Grants for Exploratory Research (EAGER)
-
The EAGER funding mechanism may be used to support exploratory work in its early stages on untested, but potentially transformative, research ideas or approaches. This work may be considered especially "high risk-high payoff" in the sense that it, for example, involves radically different approaches, applies new expertise, or engages novel disciplinary or interdisciplinary perspectives.
-
These exploratory proposals may also be submitted directly to an NSF program, but the EAGER mechanism should not be used for projects that are appropriate for submission as “regular” (i.e., non-EAGER) NSF proposals.
-
-
Requirements as stated in PAPPG 23-1
-
View EAGER Awards - NSF Advanced Award Search
DRAFT YOUR PROPOSAL: Section Instructions and Resources
This guide provides quick-reference information and templates for specific sections required in NSF proposals (refer to RFP for special requirements). Content is based on NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) 24-1 (effective 05/19/2024).
-
Format Requirements (font, spacing, margins, pagination, etc.)
-
Project Summary (1 page max, includes 3 required sections)
-
Project Description (15 pages max)
-
Broader Impacts (required)
-
Resource: Broader Impacts Writing Guide
-
Resource: Broader Impacts: Improving Society - from NSF
-
Resource: ARIS Broader Impacts Toolkit (tool for BI planning, developing evaluation of BI, and more)
-
-
Results from Prior NSF Support (required if applicable, only allowed for PIs/CoPIs. Use required subheadings)
-
Budget and Budget Justification
-
UCF Office of Research Budget Guidance (NSF Budget Template)
-
NSF allows budgeting costs for publication/dissemination and computer services
-
-
Biographical Sketch (SciENcv required, FAQs available)
-
Required for each individual identified as senior/key personnel.
-
Edited PDF files downloaded from SciENcv will be returned without review.
-
-
Synergistic Activities (NEW SECTION, 1 page max)
-
Collaborators and Other Affiliations (COA) (NSF template required, FAQs available)
-
Current and Pending (Other) Support (SciENcv required, FAQs available)
-
Edited PDF files downloaded from SciENcv will be returned without review.
-
-
Mentoring Plan (required if budget includes Postdocs or Graduate students, 1 page max)
-
Data Management and Sharing Plan (2 pages max)
-
Letters of Collaboration (1-sentence format required unless noted by the solicitation)
The OR Research Development Team can provide support with proposal coordination, templates, samples, supplemental documents, reviews, and more. Visit our website for more information.
POINTS OF CONTACT
NSF Point of Contact at UCF
This point of contact is very familiar with NSF priorities/processes and can give helpful advice to increase the competitiveness of your proposal.
Saiful Khondaker, PhD
Interim Asst. VP for Research Advancement
Professor of Nanoscience, Physics, Electrical Engineering
University of Central Florida
407-864-5054
Saiful@ucf.edu
Additionally, information on Office of Research points of contact related to contracts, proposal submission, compliance, tech transfer, IRB, and IACUC is available at research.ucf.edu
Support from UCF Librarians
General Proposal Support from Research Development Team
Now that you have found the perfect funding opportunity, let us help you build the perfect proposal. The OR Research Development team can help with planning, preparation assistance, draft review feedback, informational resources, and more! Visit our website for next steps information.
Find Potential Collaborators
Find potential collaborators via the PIVOT Database - Run a search or View tutorials
Find scholarship resulting from NSF Awards by using the Web of Science - View tutorial or Search now
See UCF awardees with the NSF Award Database - Active Awards or All Awards
The OR Research Development Team would be happy to help search for potential collaborators at UCF. Visit our website for more information.